How Corporate Taxes Could Impact Markets This Election Season
As the presidential debate season kicks off, the current and former presidents’ divergent tax approaches will be displayed. Naturally, this is a controversial topic fueled by strong political views on our nation’s priorities, government spending, entitlement programs, fairness around taxation, and much more.
While taxes affect all parts of our financial lives, their impact on the stock market is not what many might guess. As the rhetoric from both sides of the aisle heats up, how can investors stay level-headed and stick to their long-term financial plans?
Tax rates have fluctuated throughout history..
Investors often focus on corporate tax rates because they can directly affect the profitability of large companies and, thus, their share prices. However, tax rates and the nation’s tax philosophy have fluctuated throughout history.
As the accompanying chart shows, corporate and individual tax rates were higher for much of the 20th century before declining during the Reagan era. The stereotype of each party is that Republicans favor lower taxes while Democrats support higher rates, particularly for corporate income taxes. Of course, the exact priorities and proposals of each party have evolved over the decades, especially around balancing the budget.
How Corporate Taxes Could Impact Markets This Election Season
The cornerstone of President Trump’s tax policy was the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. To put that in context, the U.S. previously had the highest corporate tax rate of any OECD country, and the reduction puts us just below the OECD average. The corporate tax rate peaked at 52.8% in the late 1960s, although changing tax brackets make historical corporate tax comparisons challenging.
Also, what corporations actually pay can differ significantly from statutory rates.
Unlike individual tax rates, the 2017 corporate tax cut is not set to expire but can be changed by the party in power.
While it is still early in the election cycle and the candidates’ platforms may change, President Biden has proposed raising the corporate tax rate to 28% and the corporate alternative minimum tax rate (CAMT) to 21% from 15%. CAMT, created as part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, is intended to ensure that large, profitable companies pay at least a minimum amount of taxes.
While President Trump’s proposals are not yet clear, he has suggested to business leaders that he would cut the corporate tax rate to 20%.
Corporate taxes have become less important over time
Politics aside, there is, unfortunately, no simple economic answer as to how taxes impact growth and markets.
One important concept is known as the “Laffer curve” – the idea that tax receipts rise as tax rates do, but only up to a point.
Ideally, tax policy balances societal priorities with economic growth.
Proponents of cutting the corporate tax rate argue that lower taxes give companies long-term incentives to invest in productivity and can boost global competitiveness. In theory, corporate taxes are really taxes on individuals, including shareholders, workers, customers, etc.
On the other hand, given the ever-growing federal deficit and debt, proponents of raising corporate taxes argue that it is an important way to raise needed revenue.
As the accompanying chart shows, the share of revenue from corporate taxes has declined dramatically from 27% in 1950 to just 9.4% today.
In contrast, individual income taxes have remained an important share of government receipts, growing from 40% to 49% over the same period.
Social insurance and retirement receipts have helped to make up the difference, rising to 36.4% from 11.0%, as other taxes, including excise taxes, have declined in importance as a source of government funding.
Thus, although corporate taxes receive significant attention from investors, they make up a relatively small fraction of total tax revenues today.
While it may seem counterintuitive, history shows that the stock market has performed well across different tax regimes. This is partly because corporations adapt to new tax rules quickly and minimize their tax bills through a variety of strategies. It’s also because recent presidents have tended to maintain existing tax policies to avoid raising tax burdens.
That said, the other side of the tax coin is the level of government spending. Today, there is no clear path to reducing spending to lower the debt and deficit. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office has revised its estimates for the cumulative deficit from 2025 to 2034 up by $2.1 trillion, roughly 10%. The growing national debt and mounting interest payments make additional revenue likely to be needed to plug this gap in the future.
Ultimately, when it comes to market performance, investors should not overreact to broad tax policy changes or political outcomes.
The chart above shows that the stock market has performed well under both parties across a variety of tax regimes and other policies. This is because market returns depend far more on business cycles, which typically last many years and decades, making them less sensitive to individual policy changes. History does not support the idea that markets will crash solely because of the outcome of an election or a change in tax policy.
Of course, achieving our financial goals is not just about market returns. When it comes to our personal financial plans, tax and estate planning could not be more important. Investors concerned about the impact of specific tax policies are encouraged to seek the advice of a trusted financial advisor.
The bottom line? While tax policies will be at the center of the upcoming election, investors should maintain a broader perspective. Staying invested is still the best way to achieve financial goals across different political outcomes.
If you want to discuss this further, we offer a complimentary 15-minute call to discuss your concerns and share how we can help.
Stordahl Capital Management, Inc is a Registered Investment Adviser. This commentary is solely for informational purposes and reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. and should not be regarded as a description of advisory services or performance returns of any SCM Clients. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing in this piece constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Stordahl Capital Management and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advice may be rendered by Stordahl Capital Management unless a client service agreement is in place. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc provides links for your convenience to websites produced by other providers or industry-related material. Accessing websites through links directs you away from our website. Stordahl Capital Management is not responsible for errors or omissions in the material on third-party websites and does not necessarily approve of or endorse the information provided. Users who gain access to third-party websites may be subject to the copyright and other restrictions on use imposed by those providers and assume responsibility and risk from the use of those websites. Please note that trading instructions through email, fax, or voicemail will not be taken. Your identity and timely retrieval of instructions cannot be guaranteed. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. manages its clients’ accounts using a variety of investment techniques and strategies, which are not necessarily discussed in the commentary. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Copyright (c) 2024 Clearnomics, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not necessarily complete and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. The views and the other information provided are subject to change without notice. All reports posted on or via www.clearnomics.com or any affiliated websites, applications, or services are issued without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific recipient and are not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future results. Company fundamentals and earnings may be mentioned occasionally, but should not be construed as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold the company's stock. Predictions, forecasts, and estimates for any and all markets should not be construed as recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security--including mutual funds, futures contracts, and exchange traded funds, or any similar instruments. The text, images, and other materials contained or displayed in this report are proprietary to Clearnomics, Inc. and constitute valuable intellectual property. All unauthorized reproduction or other use of material from Clearnomics, Inc. shall be deemed willful infringement(s) of this copyright and other proprietary and intellectual property rights, including but not limited to, rights of privacy. Clearnomics, Inc. expressly reserves all rights in connection with its intellectual property, including without limitation the right to block the transfer of its products and services and/or to track usage thereof, through electronic tracking technology, and all other lawful means, now known or hereafter devised. Clearnomics, Inc. reserves the right, without further notice, to pursue to the fullest extent allowed by the law any and all criminal and civil remedies for the violation of its rights.